Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:18:39 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Michael Bushkov" <bushman@rsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> (Michael Bushkov's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:12:40 %2B0400") References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Michael Bushkov" <bushman@rsu.ru> writes:
> Li Xin wrote:
> > Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install
> > shared objects under alternative names? It might be painful for
> > users who wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection
> > (as OpenLDAP team moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if
> > they get a same library in /usr/lib...
> I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?
Please don't. If somebody isn't happy with the base system's libldap,
they can add WITHOUT_LDAP to their make.conf.
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hd0423zk.fsf>