Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:39:08 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Molina Wegener <dmw@unete.cl> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Which branch? Message-ID: <20051020155705.E28249@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20051020134127.GA37483@daemon.unete.cl> References: <20051020040902.GA21873@daemon.unete.cl> <20051020041709.GC22319@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20051020134127.GA37483@daemon.unete.cl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:17:09PM -0700, > Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:09:02AM -0300, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> My computer is running with FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE. I've tried >>> updating the source tree with RELENG_5, but I get some compile >>> time errors. >>> >>> Is the RELENG_5 branch abandoned? >> >> No. We can't help you with your errors though unless you tell use what >> they are. > > Ok, I want to know if the RELENG_5 bracnh is active, if have some sense > use send-pr with this branch and send patches if any. The RELENG_5 branch is alive, but will probably be somewhat quiet compared to 6.x. I've been merging netperf changes to 5.x where possible, for example, but the definition of "possible" is constrained by compatibility requirements. I anticipate continuing to do so, subject to time and compatibility concerns. My hope is to see fairly rapid adoption of 6.x, although it's not yet clear to me how the first month or so of bug reports will go for it yet. Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051020155705.E28249>