Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:00:38 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP! New netgraph code coming Message-ID: <20010116150038.X7240@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200101162138.NAA10547@curve.dellroad.org>; from archie@dellroad.org on Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:38:14PM -0800 References: <xzpae8rjqzt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200101162138.NAA10547@curve.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> [010116 13:39] wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > > At some point in the past, MODULE_VERSION wasn't required. Whoever > > > committed the checkin that made suddenly made MODULE_VERSION required > > > should have added it to all affected files, or at least there should > > > have been a HEADS UP, but I don't recall seeing one. > > > > If I recall correctly, it was Mike, and the commit message was fairly > > explicit. > > It seems like fairly explicit commit message wasn't sufficient then. > Whatever.. developers should pay more attention and committers should > be more explicit. ~ % man 9 module No entry for module in section 9 of the manual ~ % man 9 MODULE No entry for MODULE in section 9 of the manual ~ % man 9 MODULE_VERSION No entry for MODULE_VERSION in section 9 of the manual ? This ought to be documented. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010116150038.X7240>