Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:23:27 -0700
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
To:        Holger Kipp <hk@alogis.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, jan6146@gmail.com, Curtis Penner <curtis.penner2@gmail.com>, Antoine BRUNEL <antoinebrunel@yahoo.fr>
Subject:   Re: Sysinstall is still inadequate after all of these years
Message-ID:  <486CEEEF.8030808@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080703085629.GA1590@intserv.int1.b.intern>
References:  <784966050807021123l267aa20en39eb513c12c90ad2@mail.gmail.com>	<486BFE3B.3040509@gmail.com> <486C0928.8050607@yahoo.fr> <20080703085629.GA1590@intserv.int1.b.intern>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Holger Kipp wrote:
> 
> I completely 100% agree. Actually I don't see the need for a new
> sysinstall. It does what it needs to do. I have seen the later
> RH- and SUSE-Installer, but I don't want them. What's the use of
> a graphical installer?

One big problem with the current installer:  The
current keyboard interaction is quite mystifying
to new users.

I taught a FreeBSD class for a while where I watched
every single person stumble just trying to figure
out how to select choices in the installer menus.

I don't think a graphical installer is necessarily
the answer to this.  Simply obeying long-established
conventions for keyboard usage (ENTER selects the
thing under the cursor, for instance, instead of
having to TAB to the "OK" button first) would go
a long ways.

Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486CEEEF.8030808>