Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:13:01 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: autotools@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING Message-ID: <4502DA34-12D4-4F61-A13B-D9807637BD23@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3C14D56E-F631-4E84-8D38-1092FC8C861A@mac.com> References: <18672476.67591284594229837.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> <3C14D56E-F631-4E84-8D38-1092FC8C861A@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Barbara wrote: >> About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry = in=20 >> MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? >> Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a = new=20 >> version of autoconf? With "sweeping" ports such as autotools, the consensus is to bump = PORTREVISIONs on affected dependent ports, even if they are build = dependencies only. We've tried in the past to get creative in what does = and doesn't get bumped, and it always generates more problems than it = solves. On Sep 15, 2010, at 18:48 , Chuck Swiger wrote: > It looks like maybe a repocopy is going on (or has gone wrong), since = it is pointing to autoconf-2.62: You need to update your ports tree. Makefile is revision 1.77, not 1.75 = as you have shown. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4502DA34-12D4-4F61-A13B-D9807637BD23>