Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 00:52:01 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Merge ping+ping6 and traceroue+traceroute6 to single utilities? Message-ID: <1043056268.20140112005201@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1E09095E-82BB-448E-8EE5-52830F664C3D@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <1063008459.20140111160525@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52D14140.3090003@gibfest.dk> <a46d4e716d15f48b1d4bd32c22dce45c@mailbox.ijs.si> <1218795565.20140111222236@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1E09095E-82BB-448E-8EE5-52830F664C3D@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Bjoern. You wrote 11 января 2014 г., 23:39:48: >> >> MM> The ping6 and traceroute6 could be made just links to a common utility >> MM> and turn on the -6 option implicitly. For a transition period I could >> MM> live with the -4 being a default, if that would be a consensus. >> Exactly my point of view. BAZ> Question — will you preserve (conflicting) command line options and if It is good question, indeed. BAZ> it’s one utility and I use a hostname how will it know how to interpret them? hostname gives ambiguity only if here are both A and AAAA records AND we have both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses configured. In such case we should choose sane default, which could depends on argv[0] :) Also, options parsing could depends on argv[0] too, for backward compatibility. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1043056268.20140112005201>