Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:42:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: ru@FreeBSD.org Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP (+sppp) Message-ID: <200103301642.f2UGglo40730@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20010330172355.A94198@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Mär, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> [Redirected to -net]
Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to -net. Thanks.
>> If I use
>> route add default -interface isp1
>> I wan't to have the packets routed trough isp1. I don't care about how
>> the routing table is held consistent, but I if the route is discarded
>> without my interaction it not only violates POLA, in this case it's
>> prohibits a valid use of the -interface feature (dial on demand via sppp
>> is broken at the moment).
>>
> OK, finally got it. When the interface goes down, the address is still
> valid, and there is no reason to delete (static?) routes that use this
> address, but the new code does. I was confused by the code comment below
I didn't have a static IP address. The only static thing in this context
is the interface the defaultroute is assigned to. At every
dial-on-demand I get another IP.
[Patch]
> Let me know if it works for you.
I give it a try and report later.
Thanks,
Alexander.
--
To boldly go where I surely don't belong.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103301642.f2UGglo40730>