Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:02:04 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of SAMBA on FreeBSD Message-ID: <485a5756-ca36-bba6-62c8-c76022b05452@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK2GCNGZ6NrFOmPA0UP6hLjPOtVp9awL2ATvnL00O8twsA@mail.gmail.com> References: <e1c72d2dea66d367956e62edf7bec052.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> <CA%2BtpaK1UEtvyeRYSSLaOPoHb=Nmy4omDiyCvSdDtw-iKvsRYyw@mail.gmail.com> <f6ba7e46e75e497460793205e261851a.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> <CA%2BtpaK2B-50-DSP0RNUGkzMZKoqBBMj08dHCWEs2sSQXQ_d-_Q@mail.gmail.com> <411eb82456c15c41763909673a63208b.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> <CA%2BtpaK2GCNGZ6NrFOmPA0UP6hLjPOtVp9awL2ATvnL00O8twsA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/17/17 23:18, Adam Vande More wrote: > What? It doesn't seem like you have a good enough understanding to make a > claim like that. It is quite clear that bug is relavant only to jailed > instances of samba, and VFS related perms. Your current was already > explained to you once, and you've been reminded of it. Sorry to step in like this, but I find the original question quite interesting. Since we are using jailed Samba 4.4 instances, I'd be very worried if this setup would lose support in the future. Is there any plan to allow Samba to properly work in a jail? bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?485a5756-ca36-bba6-62c8-c76022b05452>