Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:05:43 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FAQ confusion Message-ID: <200301242205.h0OM5h2u048862@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20030123232610.GA2671@submonkey.net> References: <xzp4r80hu2o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030123175022.GA11524@submonkey.net> <200301231955.h0NJtEfO031355@intruder.bmah.org> <20030123232610.GA2671@submonkey.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > For the Web site, I (somewhat clumsily) attempted to define the concept
> > of multiple releases that could be considered "current". At the time,
> > it was critical that we be able to do this without changing the files
> > that didn't need to express this concept. The result can be seen in
> > revision 1.12 of www/en/includes.xsl and revision 1.55 of
> > www/en/includes.sgml. This is a gross hack, but it kind of fit at the
> > time.
>
> I saw the commit, but didn't look at the deltas yet; I'll do so.
>
> I also hesitate to suggest this, but if this can't be fixed soon (and I'm
> very sorry, but I *know* I can't do it "soon"), it just might be worth
> manually editing that part of the FAQ, as I assume that we'll have a lot
> more users looking at this over the next few weeks. Yes, it's cvs-hell,
> but at least it won't look silly ;)
OK, done. Please see the following commit:
-----
bmah 2003/01/24 13:58:17 PST
Modified files:
en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
Log:
"Fix" the FAQ so that it can deal with the concept of two "latest"
releases of FreeBSD (at the moment, 4.7 and 5.0).
This is a hack. It really needs to be fixed to be more generalized
and so that this concept can be used in documents other than the FAQ.
But at least for now, we don't say weird things like "5.0-RELEASE is
the latest release from the 4-STABLE branch".
Revision Changes Path
1.509 +40 -4 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml
-----
We need to do this much cleaner. Probably this involves defining
entities in doc/share/sgml/freebsd.ent, similar to what I did for the
Web site (but pick better names). We might also think about
entity-izing the names of branches, like I do in the release
documentation. Finally, someone familiar with the Handbook might want
to make a pass through that document to see if anything needs fixing.
I disclaim ownership of this task...I'm still decompressing from
5.0-RELEASE. We have until 4.8 to get this fixed correctly, so there's
a little time to toss this idea around on the list.
Cheers,
Bruce.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506
iD8DBQE+Mbi22MoxcVugUsMRAjxEAKDlZAurN0sfVrfhdzsrvJPDpoT1uQCgr1nx
s8CGxs28qYc9QkHavKScIrs=
=j5kf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301242205.h0OM5h2u048862>