Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 17:00:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrea Campi <andrea@webcom.it> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs mkfs.c Message-ID: <20030522165905.R2984@znfgre.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <20030522235524.GB6396@webcom.it> References: <20030522183930.564EF37B49D@hub.freebsd.org> <20030522161035.X95941@root.org> <20030522235524.GB6396@webcom.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Andrea Campi wrote:
> What about actually making the -STABLE fsck UFS2 aware, at least to the
> point of printing "This is an UFS2 fs, can't check it" instead? Without
> looking at the code, this sounds trivial to me; and while it can't help
> with already installed systems, it would still be useful.
I think that's a very valid second step, and I hope someone takes it on. I
felt that this step was much more important to accomplish prior to the
release however.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030522165905.R2984>