Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:26:48 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speex upgrade to 1.1.12 ? Message-ID: <20070222122648.A9443@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <op.tn52vigl9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>; from mezz7@cox.net on Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:22:20PM -0600 References: <op.tn34fuds9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221112414.E91427@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn372ibm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <op.tn4hkoua9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070221160312.A94968@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn5vkdeh9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070222095543.A7555@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn51nvp99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20070222120126.A8925@xorpc.icir.org> <op.tn52vigl9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:22:20PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:01:26 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:56:09PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:55:43 -0600, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:44:27AM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > ... > >> >> -CONFIGURE_TARGET -> USE_GNOME=gnometarget > >> >> -Add USE_GNOME=ltverhack to avoid shared library version bump to > >> often > >> >> by > >> >> fix libtool bug. > >> > >> FYI: The result is libspeex.so.1 now instead of libspeex.so.[3|5]. > > > > Just curious - now the library number (used to be 3) goes back to 1, > > so is there anything that expect version number not to go back ? > > I am a bit confuse with your question, so I am not sure if I answer > correct to your question. It is expected to go back to 1, because it is a > correct number. The speex in Linux has .so.1 too. There is a bug in well basically the question was that for good or bad, the previous version of the library (speex.1.0.5) in FreeBSD was 3 and now becomes something different even though the ABI has not changed (hopefully; we know it is backward compatible, i have no idea if it has more in it). On the other hand, if the linux version is .1 maybe some scripts and makefiles look for .1 so it is more convenient to use the same version number. Fair enough. cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070222122648.A9443>