Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:49:17 +0100
From:      Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net>
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PORTREVISION bump, how deep should I go?
Message-ID:  <20040308064917.GC72179@graf.pompo.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040308011154.GA35894@k7.mavetju>
References:  <20040308011154.GA35894@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le Lun  8 mar 04 =E0  2:11:54 +0100, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
 =E9crivait=A0:
> Hello,

Hello Edwin,

> With regarding to ports/57475, it does do a version bump of libsdl.so.
> With regarding to the ports depending on this one, what should I do?
>=20
> - PORTVERSION change for devel/sdl12, that's enough
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports directly depending on devel/sdl12
>   (with grepping for USE_SDL)
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12 (based
>   on grepping INDEX for sdl12)
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12, even
>   if they are hidden behind a HAVE_SDL
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports in the tree
>=20
> Personally, for me the first option is enough (and portupgrade
> should do the trick anyway), I wouldn't find figuring out for option
> two, but then I know that option three and/or option four is more
> reasonable then. Options five is useless there but just to complete,
> I don't think too many people who are in the right state of mind
> would suggest that one anyway.

When writing this PR, I was rather thinking about option 3; since then,
a lot of ports have been using USE_SDL, and option 2 should be OK.

Option 1 is not sufficient by itself: you should ask everybody to
`portupgrade -r devel/sdl12', and this is a waste of resources.

Regards,
--=20
Th. Thomas.

--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFATBdtc95pjMcUBaIRAsn3AKC2h3mXP8W+tgj1+QPSo7tFcssFggCg1UVU
RDVXo56nlr13rVGHiwA4Nzw=
=n0Rh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040308064917.GC72179>