Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:35:49 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/libreadline/readline Makefile Message-ID: <20020415073549.GA19816@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020415065538.GB2452@sunbay.com> References: <200204091302.g39D2QV05151@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020412113309.GA1551@nagual.pp.ru> <20020412114540.GB27751@sunbay.com> <20020412115414.GC1551@nagual.pp.ru> <20020412142553.GA45365@sunbay.com> <20020412151224.GA8492@nagual.pp.ru> <20020415065538.GB2452@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:55:38 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Repeat after me: we don't have the termcap library for now. That simple. It is stupid to repeat that folly. We HAVE termcap library. Implementation details doesn't matter. F.e. if termcap library will be included into libc, your next move will be just remove it from Makefiles, breaking bulding at the systems with valid API. It seems you know nothing about termcap and curses libraries. General curses library may not support termcap functions at all, f.e. terminfo-based libary. Any termcap application will fails linking with that. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBPLqC1OJgpPLZnQjrAQH7iAP/Uwc5S2LUnfsml/1huroTtjRhTRwKWNAI lNxUq+66YLPoHA0MBWQbaxhL8sokepdmE+djaAu7OzPgaNpSf8Az3iFfVsX//QVY GluxpVYmFx5zpAfC2oIEDQqe/i8EzpdZ6czu2QQV/Jc1eQKVeX0PlzxvFw71rj7B fqJpOaB1d2o= =6XIx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020415073549.GA19816>