Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:35:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Reed Loefgren <rloef@interfold.com> To: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@student.tue.nl> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Iva Hesy <iva.cnhn@gmail.com> Subject: Re: 6.0-BETA3: 'kldunload linux' --> panic Message-ID: <20050824072836.C15515@auden.jmla.com> In-Reply-To: <20050824004401.GA73859@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl> References: <20050823121112.GA51035@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl> <148cabbc0508231707348e29b7@mail.gmail.com> <20050824004401.GA73859@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Rene Ladan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 05:07:14PM -0700, Iva Hesy wrote:
>> On 8/23/05, Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@student.tue.nl> wrote:
>>> The following panic can reliably be reproduced on a GENERIC 6.0-BETA3
>>> kernel when loading linux support via /etc/rc.conf (linux_enable="YES")
>>> and then issuing "kldunload linux".
>>>
>> No, I have a BETA3 box too, and can unload linux kernel module after
>> booting with linux_enable="YES"...
>
> On a i386 UP ?
> CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe (should be safe)
>
> Rene
> --
> GPG fingerprint = 5FFA 3959 3377 C697 8428 24D0 BF3E F4A9 AE33 5DCC
>
> "It won't fit on the line."
> -- me, 2001
>
I have just loaded/unloaded the linux module eight times on a beta-3
single proc PIII-866 cvsupped last night; all while running 6 instances of
crashme and the load floating around 6.07.
I suspect the mentioned CFLAGS is doing what people have always been
warned it could/would do. (Sigh.) I'm sure the Release Team intends to
make 6 not only the best FreeBSD release ever, but the best .0 release
ever. And I think they're going to do it. (They'll have to to get me off
4.11 :) ).
r
----------
I'd rather flunk my Wassermann Test
Than read the poems of Edgar Guest.
- Auden
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050824072836.C15515>