Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:51:29 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@uol.com.br>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf lack of CPUTYPE=k6-3 support Message-ID: <20010312145129.A93848@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103130522390.1135-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM %2B1100 References: <3AAC8474.186B4D58@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103130522390.1135-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 05:32:36AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > k6-2 is already over-engineered. The only difference between it and k6 > is 3dnow, but neither gcc nor any source files support 3dnow (now :-). 3dnow support exists in several ports, though. OTOH, k6-3 doesn't add any new features, so it's debatable on those grounds. > OTOH, bsd.cpu.mk is too under-engineered to support any compiler except > gcc. It unconditionally translates FreeBSD-specific names like k6-2 to > gcc-specific flags like -march=k6. I'm not sure what can be done about that -- is there a way for make(1) to know it's being used with a gcc compiler so we can .ifdef the whole lot? Kris --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6rVLxWry0BWjoQKURAlXcAKC5CVbpUFhtPFrCGvtK0j/MZggPxwCgkED3 CfJVeRzyYi6jkNBj6rlrqz0= =wqKs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010312145129.A93848>