Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 23:20:43 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> Cc: Yuri <yuri@aetern.org>, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Deprecating smbfs(5) and removing it before FreeBSD 14 Message-ID: <YQXPR0101MB0968BAB98AEFF583CA68534ADD5C9@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <CAMXt9NYbUn5fkmRory1ggfUMbgqJJyJz8sFqY=oqpThq5Hc_zg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyFy2CJKxMQQKwD3N=MTe-P4KodN77e3YCEh4z0Ssf9sXWEcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6f99f9bc-8831-aefe-4f73-72f50f8f347b@aetern.org> <79402464-f9e6-5f56-645e-cfd49640032e@quip.cz> <YQXPR0101MB0968A28AAE84DF855AF5125CDD8A9@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <7db04ed9-39eb-7163-ce92-9a52c5f7d302@quip.cz> <YQXPR0101MB096856C46CC68E39E1F8EFFCDD4F9@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <54704b99-7b89-76a4-0368-79bee391926d@quip.cz> <YQXPR0101MB09681E68BAF66F8D8160D6C2DD599@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <bf549f03-1947-fafb-c872-e78ea28ce32a@aetern.org> <YQXPR0101MB0968BAB76CAEEB3A945512DCDD599@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMXt9NYbUn5fkmRory1ggfUMbgqJJyJz8sFqY=oqpThq5Hc_zg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> wrote: [stuff snipped] > So I am looking at the Apple and Solaris code, provided by rick. I am not > sure if the illumos code provides SMB2 support. They based the solaris > code on Apple SMB-217.x which is from OSX 10.4 . Which I am sure > predates smb2 . > > https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-217.19 > > If I am following this correctly we need to look at Apple's smb client > from OSX 10.9 which is where I start to see bits about smb2 > > https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/smb/tree/smb-697.95.1/kernel/netsmb > > This is also where this stuff starts to look less and less like FreeBSD . > Let me ask some of the illumos people I know to see if there is > anything they can point to. Yes. Please do so. I saw the "old" calls fo things like open and the new ntcreate version, so I assumed that was the newer SMB. If it is not, there is no reason to port it. The new Apple code is a monster. 10x the lines of C and a lot of weird stuff that looks Apple specific. It might actually be easier to write SMBv2 from the spec than port the Apple stuff. --> I'll try and look at whatever Microsoft publishes w.r.t. SMBv2/3. Thanks for looking at this, rick -- mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org<mailto:nonesuch@longcount.org>help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YQXPR0101MB0968BAB98AEFF583CA68534ADD5C9>