Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:52:25 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Folkert Saathoff <folkert@feedface.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, snap-users@kame.net Subject: Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping Message-ID: <20050927175225.GD29415@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <F4A9DCEA-BB99-4760-9A66-C320EC11F68E@feedface.com> References: <F4A9DCEA-BB99-4760-9A66-C320EC11F68E@feedface.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Folkert Saathoff wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > Hello lists, >=20 > in order to evaluate the latency penalty induced by mobile IPv6, > i need some way to simulate different latencies between two nodes > in a laboratory environment. >=20 > Is it possible at the moment to shape IPv6 traffic with KAME SNAP =20 > 20050919 > and FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE? >=20 > If not, is there some other way to enforce latencies on an interface? Upgrade to 6.0 and use the IPv6 support in ipfw/dummynet. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOYbYXY6L6fI4GtQRAuNYAJ9jLNAs6Y+vRdw9dyKtNRLqbtD+lgCgqtDz V7HkU0aRruvWb4Xlryna7J4= =70nR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050927175225.GD29415>