Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:15:23 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: "Andrew Reilly" <areilly@bigpond.net.au> Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <200010131216.e9DCGGr13344@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:57:02 %2B1100." <20001012165702.B9109@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001012165702.B9109@gurney.reilly.home>, "Andrew Reilly" writes: > Besides: arguing that Windows does telnet out of the box > isn't a terribly defensible position, because of the terrible > compatability of their "ANSI"/VT100 emulator. I even use > TeraTerm for telnet sometimes, just because you can actually run > vi and mutt through it. I've had no problems using Windows telnet with UNIX systems or vi. Reduce the Windows telnet screen size from 25 lines to 24 and explicitly set TERM to vt100 (it's autodetected as ansi: eval `tset -Q -s -m ansi:vt100`) and you'll find that Windows telnet works well enough to do meaningful work with it. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010131216.e9DCGGr13344>