Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:28:06 +0800 From: "edwin chen" <slack@suntop-cn.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, "Lowell Gilbert" <lowell@world.std.com> Subject: Re: how about default route ? Message-ID: <002b01c17348$c5ad6800$9201a8c0@home.net> References: <000a01c17286$5deecdc0$9201a8c0@home.net> <4466843x0z.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
thanks, that's the answer I needed, edwin chen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lowell Gilbert" <lowell@world.std.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; <slack@suntop-cn.com> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 12:32 AM Subject: Re: how about default route ? > slack@suntop-cn.com (edwin chen) writes: > > > in win2000, I can setup two default route, can freebsd do that ? if can, what will happened ? if can't ,why ? > > I don't know a lot about Windows NT, but I believe that this functionality > supports automatic failover between statically configured default gateways. > FreeBSD doesn't support this, but it does support router discovery (if you > enable a routing daemon, such as routed(8)), which is usually a better way > to handle redundant paths to the Internet. If you can run real routing > protocols, that's even better, but you need support from your upstream > routers. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002b01c17348$c5ad6800$9201a8c0>