Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:19:50 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Harry Veltman <veltman@intergate.com>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which FreeBSD is best for my PC? Message-ID: <20081201121925.X9499@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <200812011153.12902.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <002701c9538a$10ff0330$005bfb48@harryveltman> <20081201113658.b0264e2e.freebsd@edvax.de> <200812011153.12902.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We have a few oldies, just installed KDE 3.5 on a: > CPU: VIA Nehemiah (997.17-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x698 Stepping = 8 > > That's pretty much as low as I'd go for normal desktop usage. The machine > you're describing, still makes for a good router or LAN resolver with low KDE make them slow. it's fast machine. > traffic webserving. Backup machine if disks are good. for this pentium 100 is OK.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081201121925.X9499>