Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:03:54 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuituia@tcc.to> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Murray Taylor <MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au> Subject: Re: WiFi HotSpot Message-ID: <AANLkTinGe0ZW%2BsNg060xdBHtMbPSSEdoWUTusVCk-rB-@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9EA5C4ECCF740346B3FFB246D0AD05EA02693350@exchange.tcc.to> References: <4CBCCA35.1020607@locolomo.org> <E194A4DE220BBE4FAF3AB7C4E7EDA08601070F68@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> <9EA5C4ECCF740346B3FFB246D0AD05EA02693350@exchange.tcc.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Maile Halatuituia <maile.halatuituia@tcc.to > wrote: > Thanks guys for your support. I will look in to the m0n0wall and > feedback to the list if I have more issue. > I would recommend staying away from m0n0wall. It's poorly supported now, and buggy. Example: http://forum.m0n0.ch/index.php?PHPSESSID=1t2d5fp3t82ghgc7a7crmd0653&topic=2025.15 it blocks NAT packets with both Keep-State and OOW set and it's not a lot of fun to track down. pfSense or rolling your own may be a better option. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinGe0ZW%2BsNg060xdBHtMbPSSEdoWUTusVCk-rB->