Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:47:31 -0800
From:      "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <testing@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Looking at replacing ATF/Kyua (in a limited fashion) with Google Test/shunit2
Message-ID:  <901D465A-9F32-4BBC-9FF6-7EB5AFAF6858@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2i5ChWgLz7mMwVAoG=YS0H7zRXgDpBwuSMSoHva-wUfug@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <45D23581-C780-4C55-80CF-19A81813D672@gmail.com> <CAOtMX2i5ChWgLz7mMwVAoG=YS0H7zRXgDpBwuSMSoHva-wUfug@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]

> On Jan 17, 2017, at 15:11, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:

…

> Before you get to far, you should ask yourself how much test case
> isolation you desire.  Googletest is great, but I think it'll be hard
> to get the strong isolation between testcases provided by ATF.
> Perhaps it'll be find if GoogleTest tests provide no per-testcase
> isolation; most C/C++ programmers don't expect it anyway.  But many of
> FreeBSD's atf-sh tests depend on it.

A lot of programmers don’t desire this at all, until they realize how their tests might be affected by system state if/when there are files/directories/other inputs infecting their results on the test system.

> Also, how are you planning to hook up GoogleTest and shunit2 to Kyua?

It’s early enough on in the process of trying to figure out how things work that I cannot definitively say, other than it may end up being something like:

kyua <-> googletest <-> atf

or something more like:

kyua <-> googletest_atf_compat

and just mimic the output of ATF, while hiding the implementation details of the test suites. If that turns out to be a pain, then I’ll just implement another hook into kyua for googletest which will implement the features we need, potentially as a patch to the port, because “legal reasons” (contributor agreements shouldn’t be impediments, but because I signed an individual CLA vs corporate CLA and they aren’t equivalent) are blocking me from giving code back to Google as a Dell EMC employee (things may change, but when I fought for a corporate CLA, it got stuck in the bureaucratic quagmire that is my company’s legal/business dept).

Thanks,
-Ngie

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=eyRn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?901D465A-9F32-4BBC-9FF6-7EB5AFAF6858>