Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:11:37 +0300
From:      Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230103 - head/etc
Message-ID:  <CAE-mSOLqVxvPNnviWCPkuyy3=qmP9qcKfKyVF=ZjNqr=fbE6jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201201140859.q0E8x2gV003415@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201201140859.q0E8x2gV003415@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 January 2012 12:59, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: dougb
> Date: Sat Jan 14 08:59:02 2012
> New Revision: 230103
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230103
>
> Log:
> =A0Now that its callers have been udpated, remove set_rcvar().
>
> =A0The concept of set_rcvar() was nice in theory, but the forks
> =A0it creates are a drag on the startup process, which is especially
> =A0noticeable on slower systems, such as embedded ones.
>
> Modified:
> =A0head/etc/rc.subr
>

Hi,

rc(8) and rc.subr(8) still reference this function.

Also, it would be fine to have some adoption to the new
set_rcvar-less order like printing The Big Warning and
still doing its job in Y.x branch and stop doing anything
in the next Y+1.x branch.


--=20
wbr,
pluknet



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-mSOLqVxvPNnviWCPkuyy3=qmP9qcKfKyVF=ZjNqr=fbE6jg>