Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:37:43 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
To:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Cc:        "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Move ctm to ports?
Message-ID:  <CADLo83_p4NZ2_aDxK_i5ET46Yy2jJQcPyQJyi9ZUSC7z_On4VA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>
References:  <4EDC5A5F.4080707@inse.ru> <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 December 2011 14:26, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> > How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>> > system, and making it into a port?
>> Please check the discussion about CVS on current@. The problem with
>> ports that they are detached from the
>> base and they are not always out of the box.
>
> ...
>
>> The rest could be addon-ports. CTM from my
>> point of view is the bootstrapping tool and it
>> should not be removed from the base.
>
> Yup !
>
>> > What would the disadvantages be?
>
> One disadvantage of CTM moving from src/ to ports/:
> There's a few rogue commiters indulging personal whims in ports/
>
> =A0( PS Stephen is also a ports@ committer, but I do Not mean him.
> =A0If keeping ctm in src/ means Stephen would need his commit bit
> =A0extended from ports/ to also include src/ too, then good to extend it)=
.
>
> =A0The vast majority of commiters in ports are good, but a few
> =A0deserve removing. =A0A few have been vandalising ports/, tossing
> =A0good stuff in the attic, just because { they personaly dont use it, &
> =A0some send-pr alleged a bug not critical to all, & tossing a port
> =A0into the Atiic was their easy way of decrementing the send-pr
> =A0count }, despite it impacted without warning, FreeBSD ports/ users
> =A0who move between releases without reading ports@ traffic.
>

CTM is maintained actively and doesn't have any security issues, so
there's no danger of that.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_p4NZ2_aDxK_i5ET46Yy2jJQcPyQJyi9ZUSC7z_On4VA>