Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:24:13 -0800
From:      Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com>
To:        Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: [RFC] USBdump patches
Message-ID:  <20101124012413.GK92881@weongyo>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=D5Spta67JfA%2BSXh2VF8dDV_aKN%2BgHYF01Znb4@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinaUNi3FGRiOkeTN2FKx3ybqE=F3W6%2BsV8qVCTf@mail.gmail.com> <201011231852.40484.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20101124001832.GI92881@weongyo> <201011231936.57818.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTi=D5Spta67JfA%2BSXh2VF8dDV_aKN%2BgHYF01Znb4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >>    - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
> >> based on mbuf including the machine filter and there were a lot of
> >> assumptions the input buffer is mbuf type.  For example, handling
> >> BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS).  However the USB packet isn't like mbuf
> >> style that it's just a linear buffer.  So the most important code
> >> or assumption wasn't compatible.
> >
> > BPF can deal with linear buffer just fine.  For example, ng_bpf(4)
> > does it.  Please see sys/netgraph/ng_bpf.c.
> >
> >>    - Just making the patch for BPF code, it looked like a trick or
> >> a hack to me because I couldn't define what BPF should be.
> >
> > If you don't want to touch bpf.c for some reason, netgraph(4) (->
> > ng_bpf) may be an alternate solution for you.
> >
> >>    - I could not define BPF exactly myself that what BPF should
> >> cover. I agreed with that BPF is for ethernet packet filtering but
> >> could not make sure myself that BPF could cover USB packets.
> >
> > BPF is a generic packet filter machine, i.e., bytecode is generic
> > enough for any type of data stream.
> 
> I agree that this is the best way forward, if it can be achieved.

Yes it's best.  I think it could be achieved.  I'll make the patch.

regards,
Weongyo Jeong




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101124012413.GK92881>