Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:53:44 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: did tar(1) loose xz compression support in 11? Message-ID: <53FCD7B8.5060300@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <cc981009f9a7332a7aad557c6a2ed216.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> References: <cc981009f9a7332a7aad557c6a2ed216.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 8/26/14 11:05 AM, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I'm currently testing 11. My build / install is from about 2 days ago. > I generally use xz compression, when creating archives. But when I > attempt the following: > > tar -cvJ --options xz:9 -f ./archive-name.tar.xz ./file > > it returns the following: > > tar: Undefined option: `xz:9' > > This has always worked in previous versions. Has the syntax changed, > and the man(1) pages just haven't caught up? I use: tar -cJ --options xz:compression-level=1 .. on head. Are you using the right syntax? -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT/Ne4AAoJEDXWlwnsgJ4E1tEH/2zy4RURWe/H9L8Nza/HOMVS n/+59PK3n1AWDGjSTQbrTrcYUU6KsPHXqGYViOFI71o1+VVPqtLvlJypsMGf4WlN C8XwaMTj6yOa51LlGsZriCQ2xaIEfb1Dv6hyJj1EzHcF6hpjfZAK1hXKTF8RLE6q HMyQVqi4u6df1o/lD4fXyLtnEX2i2GHsAiQq23949f25CpvecqiXikd9xSfTGC/J Jn3h0Zk2XQrWlNM//ylf9TzOSNnWidzrWZXR2lpnv9hL3iXh2kFL1OV+ZVR09vmW O9KBg4VV06dTvHGdKuw+lfPfD5rgxagbZ2+scf+O/QO25w5uvRL7+uE+vG4VK54= =evUA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53FCD7B8.5060300>