Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:14:16 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>, apache@freebsd.org, skv@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/p5-libapreq2: libtool fix, strip libs, pkg-plist followup, p5-fix Message-ID: <53CA9958.80406@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <53CA9694.4040409@gmx.de> References: <20140608081334.GK1427@f10.opsec.eu> <20140608083407.GL1427@f10.opsec.eu> <20140608083636.GM1427@f10.opsec.eu> <20140608085842.GO1427@f10.opsec.eu> <53945E98.3080408@gmx.de> <20140610094949.GY3484@f10.opsec.eu> <539752DE.5060208@gmx.de> <20140719151508.GB33102@f10.opsec.eu> <53CA9694.4040409@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-07-19 18:02, olli hauer wrote: > On 2014-07-19 17:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hello, >> >>>> Back to my proposed change for www/libapreq2 and this question: >>>> >>>>>> Would it be more useful to make the slave port (p5-libapreq2) >>>>>> a seperate port depending on the other ? >>>> >>>> Looking at the pkg-plist and Makefile mess: Is it really useful >>>> to have this master/slave port or should I split and depend on libapreq2 ? >> >> Attached are two diffs for both ports that seperate them. >> >>> running a short grep over the tree shows there are only two libapreq2 consumers >>> - www/mod_amazon_proxy >>> - www/p5-libapreq2 >>> >>> but eleven p5-libapreq consumers >>> - net-mgmt/netdisco >>> - net-mgmt/netdot >>> - www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib >>> - www/p5-Apache-Gallery >>> - www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl >>> - www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache >>> - www/p5-HTML-Mason >>> - www/p5-Maypole >>> - www/rt38 >>> - www/rt40.cpan >>> - www/rt42.cpan >> >> I ran a bulk poudriere run with this: >> >> www/mod_amazon_proxy >> net-mgmt/netdisco >> net-mgmt/netdot >> www/foswiki-ModPerlEngineContrib >> www/p5-Apache-Gallery >> www/p5-Apache2-SiteControl >> www/p5-CGI-Application-Plugin-Apache >> www/p5-HTML-Mason >> www/p5-Maypole >> www/rt38 >> www/rt40 >> www/rt42 >> >> and DEFAULT_VERSIONS=perl5=5.20 apache=2.2 >> >> without problems on 10amd64 and 91amd64. >> >> Attached are the two diffs, please comment, and if it's OK, please >> approve. >> >> I'll also update 191161 for testing. >> > > Hi Kurt, > > seems some files are missing in the p5-libapreq2.diff > >>From the p5-libapreq2.diff > Only in p5-libapreq2: distinfo > Only in p5-libapreq2: files > Only in p5-libapreq2: pkg-descr > Only in p5-libapreq2: pkg-plist > > > Can you shape a svn diff? > > $ mkdir fix_libapreq > $ cd fix_libapreq > $ svn checkout --depth empty svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports > $ cd ports > $ svn up --set-depth empty www > $ svn up www/libapreq2 www/p5-libapreq2 > # apply your patches > $ svn diff > my.diff > > > If your test build was OK feel free to commit your patches. > In case you haven't received any feedback about p5-libapreq2 reset the MAINTAINER and go on. >From ports/svnadmin/access: r316225 | tabthorpe | 2013-04-22 14:31:12 +0200 (Mon, 22 Apr 2013) | 5 lines - Take skv's commit bit in for safe keeping -- olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53CA9958.80406>