Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:47:13 +0000 From: "karels (Mike Karels)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D8904: inet: Fix routing issue by calling if_up() Message-ID: <cda92ef427ced2c34ea93bae6c49a12a@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-ep6hmkx4cno4dfdlhp4a-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-ep6hmkx4cno4dfdlhp4a-req@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
karels added a comment. I think the change is a step in the right direction. Certainly, "ifconfig xxN down" followed by an implicit UP should not cause any change to the routing table. Does anyone know why the "down" is removing the route? That seems wrong to me. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8904 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, adrian, bz, gnn, hiren, glebius, rwatson, karels Cc: hrs, freebsd-net-listhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cda92ef427ced2c34ea93bae6c49a12a>