Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:43:03 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: Peter Palmreuther <pitpalme+unix@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_7 crashes SIGSEGV Message-ID: <200912211043.03557.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <A9FE849A-D9ED-440B-94B4-C2A43266FB96@gmail.com> References: <200912172157.04528.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <A9FE849A-D9ED-440B-94B4-C2A43266FB96@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Sunday 20 December 2009 19:16:05 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Pet= er Palmreuther =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > Hi, >=20 > On 12/17/2009 at 20:57 Achilleas Mantzios wrote: >=20 > > Peter,=20 > > have you tried: > > a) building the native FreeBSD 8.0 jdk1.6 from ports? > > b) openjdk6? > > my intuition says that the native jdk1.6 (non diablo) could be the best= option for FreeBSD 8.0, at least at this stage. >=20 > Thanks for your response. >=20 > I've installed 'jdk-1.6.0.3p4_13' from ports but get different problems u= sing it. > Tomcat, which I'd like to run, doesn't start using native JDK. > Meanwhile I found freebsd-java list archive, searched a little bit and gu= ess I'm running into >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D128948 >=20 > I'll try if my Tomcat can be started using '-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3D= true' and then use native JDK1.6.\ Thats almost a classic situation, no idea tho, why Andrew Reilly (the PR o= riginator) didn't manage to make it work. Just add -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue, or just recompile jdk16 to disa= ble IPV6 support. See also here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D9531 As Greg, said, we better focus on openjdk, try to use tomcat with openjdk. = (its available as a package, in case you want to avoid compilations) I have used openjdk with jboss succesfully, for the last 2 weeks (but so di= d i for diablo as well). I hope you manage to solve your issue. >=20 > Any chance diablo-jdk nevertheless being fixed and updated? >=20 > And what about PR 128948? It's more than one year old and still suffers t= he same problem ... >=20 > Thanks a lot, =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912211043.03557.achill>