Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:11:12 -0500
From:      Redmond Militante <r-militante@northwestern.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   ipfilter/natd for windows domain controllers
Message-ID:  <20030829141112.GB2456@darkpossum>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi

i have an ipfilter/ipnat box, that i'm using to protect an apache webserver.
the machine is 4.7-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p3 #1: Mon Aug 11 18:27:0=
6 CDT 2003.  the machine is a dell optiplex gx260 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU=
 2.40GHz 512 mb of ram.  it's been doing a fine job.

my boss asked me today whether he could stick his two windows 2000 domain c=
ontrollers behind the ipf/ipnat box.  the domain controllers are pretty bus=
y.  they get about 4000-5000 authentication requests on a typical day.  whi=
le i was at it, i was thinking of putting my mysql server behind the firewa=
ll.

my question is - do i need to upgrade my hardware?  or is my setup sufficie=
nt to handle the 3 extra machines?

thanks
redmond


--=20
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Thu Aug 28 12:42:04 CDT 2=
003
 9:00AM  up 19:57, 2 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.15, 0.26
=20
'I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it."
		-- Mae West
=20

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/T17/7g+NJl/fSB0RAvUbAKC0GZBpu7+xmytxHcaZOViRcxA68QCgoSmH
VM75avFQsDW9zGZDK3vMSDU=
=reDH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gatW/ieO32f1wygP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030829141112.GB2456>