Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:28:46 -0500
From:      slave-mike <slave-mike@slavepix.com>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: atapicam broken by ata_lowlevel.c rev.1.23
Message-ID:  <3FDAB19E.9050403@slavepix.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FDA8FEE.4070403@freebsd.org>
References:  <20031114080021.L3913@gamplex.bde.org> <20031127144834.Y77022@gamplex.bde.org> <20031127060730.GB24980@dan.emsphone.com> <0t4qw61041.wl@nohost.unb.ca> <20031213121725.N2797@gamplex.bde.org> <3FDA8FEE.4070403@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does this correct the sense bugs/requirements for -force when using 
cdrecord when burning cd's?
Scott Long wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 bremner@unb.ca wrote:
>>
>>
>>> At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:07:30 -0600,
>>> Dan Nelson wrote:
>>>
>>>> In the last episode (Nov 27), Bruce Evans said:
>>>>
>>>>> [Resending due to no response after 2 weeks.]
>>>>>
>>>>> Rev.1.23 of ata-lowlevel.c broke atapicam on my BP6 system as shown
>>>>> by the enclosed boot -v messages (the system just hangs, apparently
>>>>> waiting for a disk interrupt that never arrives; there seems to be no
>>>>> timeout).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it's any consolation: "me too" :)  Backing out 1.23 worked for me as
>>>> well.  The system that I saw the hang on isn't SMP.  I also
>>>> pre-emptively patched another SMP system before I had to drive in to
>>>> fix it if it hung.
>>>
>>>
>>> I just wanted to report that my boot hang problems (which were "cured"
>>> by reverting to revision 1.22 of ata-lowlevel.c) have gone away with
>>> 5.2-RC1; more precisely with 5.2-CURRENT of Dec. 10.
>>
>>
>>
>> This was fixed (apparently without knowing about all the reports of the
>> bug's realized potential) in:
>>
>> % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v
>> % Working file: atapi-cam.c
>> % head: 1.29
>> % ...
>> % ----------------------------
>> % revision 1.29
>> % date: 2003/12/05 01:02:46;  author: scottl;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
>> % Fix a potential problem with atapi-cam where an incorrect flag is 
>> passed
>> % into the ata queueing layer.
>> %
>> % Approved by:    re
>> % ----------------------------
>>
>> Bruce
>>
> 
> Oh, I knew about the reports, but I couldn't find a direct link between
> the bug that I was fixing (merely via code inspection) and the reported
> problems.  Since I couldn't prove the link, I didn't want to get
> everyone's hopes up.  It's good to see that my suspicion of it fixing
> the problems was correct =-)
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


-- 
http://slavepix.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FDAB19E.9050403>