Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Feb 1998 10:08:13 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Adam David <adam@veda.is>
To:        alex@FreeBSD.ORG (Alex Nash)
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.cy
Message-ID:  <199802171008.KAA24675@veda.is>
In-Reply-To: <199802170504.VAA04850@freefall.freebsd.org> from Alex Nash at "Feb 16, 98 09:04:58 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> alex        1998/02/16 21:04:58 PST
> 
>   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_2_2)
>     sbin/ipfw            ipfw.c 
>   Log:
>   Partial unmerge from -current: don't use <sysexits.h>.  While this
>   would work fine for 2.2.6-RELEASE and beyond, many 2.2.5-stable
>   installations will still be using the broken version of rc.network
>   which expects to see a return value of 1 as the failure exit code.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.34.2.15 +24 -27    src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.c

If they are going to the trouble of updating the binaries beyond -release,
why would they want to omit updating the contents of /etc for those files
where it matters?

--
Adam David <adam@veda.is>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802171008.KAA24675>