Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Nov 1999 14:14:41 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Barry Irwin <bvi@rucus.ru.ac.za>, Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why not sandbox BIND?
Message-ID:  <199911122114.OAA20606@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199911121946.LAA24616@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <4.2.0.58.19991111220759.044f46d0@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911120922190.85007-100000@jade.chc-chimes.c <4.2.0.58.19991112102309.045abf00@localhost> <19991112173306.D76708@florence.pavilion.net> <19991112212912.Z57266@rucus.ru.ac.za> <199911121946.LAA24616@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     Speaking of default system configurations - what do people think about
>     turning off the 'ftp' service in the default configuration?

Personally, I don't like it.  At least, not until SSH becomes a default
protocol in the system, since otherwise there is no way to transfer
files to/from FreeBSD boxes easily.


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911122114.OAA20606>