Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 21:27:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Troy Settle <rewt@i-Plus.net> To: David Babler <dbabler@Rigel.orionsys.com> Cc: zoonie <zoonie@myhouse.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ISDN Terminal Adaptor recommendation Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980529212119.12599A-100000@Radford.i-Plus.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980529120124.27171t-100000@Rigel.orionsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 May 1998, David Babler wrote: > Ah, okay - I misunderstood then, I thought you were talking about the ISDN > connection on *my* end when you mentioned redialing. The customer already > has an ISDN connection to another provider and is running iShare on his > Novell network to make the connection; the only new equipment here is on > my end, not his. I *was* looking at the USR/3COM ISDN Couriers or IPool > TA's originally. If this is the case, I would strongly recommend going with PRI service, terminated into an Ascend Max 6k (or similar). If you need BRI, take a look at the Max 1800. We use both, and have 0 ISDN problems. As an example, I had my LAN at home routed through a Pipeline 50 connected to the 1800 at work. This worked great, but was overkill when I went down to 1 box at home. While a consumer grade ISDN TA or router will work, it doesn't leave much room for growth. -- Troy Settle <st@i-Plus.net> Network Administrator, iPlus Internet Services http://www.i-Plus.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980529212119.12599A-100000>