Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:44:57 +0300 From: "Andrew L. Neporada" <andr@dgap.mipt.ru> To: Warner Losh <imp@rover.village.org> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: "configured irq .. is not in bitmap of probed irqs 0" -- what does it mean? Message-ID: <20050125084457.GA9093@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050124.102203.74714423.imp@harmony.village.org> References: <20050123203516.GT628@cicely12.cicely.de> <20050124170008.GA6817@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> <20050124170643.GG628@cicely12.cicely.de> <20050124.102203.74714423.imp@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:22:03AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > > sio2 irq10 981321 757 > > > sio3 irq11 981382 757 > > > Total 2316081 1788 > > > > Looks like everything is fine and the message is just false alarm. > > It might be a false alarm. The interrupt rate is kinda high, > indicating that you are running full speed without pause the entire > time the system has been up. It is interesting to note that both > serial ports have very similar numbers, which seems improbable over > such a long period of time. I think this is because both ports have transferred the same amount of data (~10Mb) during testing. ;-) > > These are the symptoms that I've observed > in interrupt storms in the past. > > Warner Andrew.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050125084457.GA9093>