Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 21:23:00 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu <hsu@clinet.fi> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: hsu@clinet.fi, freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: kern/600: PPP does not pay attention to IPTOS_LOWDELAY Message-ID: <199507081823.VAA18908@katiska.clinet.fi> In-Reply-To: <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199507080000.RAA29882@freefall.cdrom.com> <199507081442.QAA21479@uriah.heep.sax.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
J Wunsch writes:
> > + /*
> > + * Most high-priority services set IPTOS_LOWDELAY. This is a much more
> > + * generic mechanism than specific port numbers. This same mechanism
> > + * is used by slip.
> > + */
> > + if (ip->ip_tos & IPTOS_LOWDELAY)
> > + ifq = &sc->sc_fastq;
> > +
>
> About to commit it. Btw., the ``interactive'' hack has been removed
> from if_sl.c in 4.4BSD. Is this a good or a bad thing?
I haven't got a slightest idea.
> Who's actually setting IPTOS_LOWDELAY?
rlogin, telnet, ftp (for its control port), some others (RSN). It seems
that support for it has sneaked in without anyone noticing, I had been
under impression that noone really uses it.
--
Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND,
hsu@clinet.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4375209 fax -4555276
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507081823.VAA18908>