Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:14 +0100
From:      Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output
Message-ID:  <EEA957E3-6975-46F5-96DC-D8EFB5FEBBCD@lastsummer.de>
In-Reply-To: <bcee818f-f6e4-a0ff-6dcd-01687cc8b909@yandex.ru>
References:  <2456B7E6-2425-4D86-A02B-33CE1EFEB608@lastsummer.de> <bcee818f-f6e4-a0ff-6dcd-01687cc8b909@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all,

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> I have some thought related to your proposal.
> What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags?
> With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consumers and handle
> tags identically in all *proto*_output() routines.

The proposed changes are now available at:

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8877


Cheers,
Franco



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EEA957E3-6975-46F5-96DC-D8EFB5FEBBCD>