Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:14 +0100 From: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output Message-ID: <EEA957E3-6975-46F5-96DC-D8EFB5FEBBCD@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <bcee818f-f6e4-a0ff-6dcd-01687cc8b909@yandex.ru> References: <2456B7E6-2425-4D86-A02B-33CE1EFEB608@lastsummer.de> <bcee818f-f6e4-a0ff-6dcd-01687cc8b909@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, > On 14 Nov 2016, at 1:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote: > > I have some thought related to your proposal. > What you think if we will introduce new KPI to work with fwd_tags? > With such KPI we can make fwd_tags opaque for PFIL consumers and handle > tags identically in all *proto*_output() routines. The proposed changes are now available at: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8877 Cheers, Franco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EEA957E3-6975-46F5-96DC-D8EFB5FEBBCD>