Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:27:08 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated gjournal patches [20061024]. Message-ID: <20061025172707.GA3005@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <eho3ng$7gj$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20061024152308.GG75746@garage.freebsd.pl> <ehlfjn$hbi$1@sea.gmane.org> <200610242150.54923.antik@bsd.ee> <20061025143446.GE1167@garage.freebsd.pl> <eho3ng$7gj$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:35:03PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:50:54PM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote: >=20 > >> Now I can mount it but only as journaled one.... Can I benefit from jo= urnaling=20 > >> with other filesystems other than UFS2 right now? > >=20 > > No. >=20 > Hmmm. Isn't it more of the case that you CAN benefit from journaling as > long as the file system is simple enough (like msdosfs) or you're using > it just for the performance and don't mind the fscks (like ext2)? >=20 > I.e. it's still a generic journaling layer with UFS as a special > marginal case, right? That's right. There can be performance benefits, but one has to verify this in specific workload. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFP55rForvXbEpPzQRApGhAJ9GLUgYMSammcm8+IldTHXUMECB+gCgsiCo hsZScRM5L7N9P7rPf77DUU8= =48Li -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061025172707.GA3005>