Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:46:56 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPE as a consistent element of pkg annotations Message-ID: <8634d9rlzj.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <508d5c63-2a1e-41be-a660-b8597aed2c70@heuristicsystems.com.au> (Dewayne Geraghty's message of "Tue, 13 May 2025 10:28:00 %2B1000") References: <72b26605-50ac-41c5-aca0-aaf93f091436@heuristicsystems.com.au> <86msbis8e2.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <1b98ae6a-d0b0-496d-a32a-3202f41244dd@heuristicsystems.com.au> <86ikm6s4i2.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <508d5c63-2a1e-41be-a660-b8597aed2c70@heuristicsystems.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au> writes: > Subsequent to an offline discussion with DES, I'm sharing the conclusion: > [...] That's cute, but a more accurate summary would be that I wasted literal hours yesterday going over the spec and the code line by line and word by word in case you had seen something I'd missed and rebutting your email point by point, whereupon you glossed over nearly everything I'd written, continued to insist that the spec says something else than what it actually does, and told me your life story in an effort to convince me that you're a Special Boy and that I should be grateful for having my time wasted by you. I'm not opposed to “positive contributions”, as you put it, but they have to be anchored in reality. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.orghelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8634d9rlzj.fsf>