Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:43:55 +0100 From: Koop Mast <kwm@FreeBSD.org> To: "varga.michal@gmail.com" <varga.michal@gmail.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: marcuscom and www/epiphany-extensions Message-ID: <1267112635.4439.27.camel@headache.rainbow-runner.nl> In-Reply-To: <3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b@mail.gmail.com> References: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> <4B867F67.50409@freebsd.org> <3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:13 +0100, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 2/25/10 6:18 AM, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hello guys, > >> > >> it's been quite some months into the 2.29 development cycle, and there > >> is still no www/epiphany-extensions on marcuscom to be seen. Is there > >> something wrong that prevents it from being ported, or it's just an > >> oversight / lack of manpower? (In that case, I could do it.) > > > > As far as I know, it's an oversight. I didn't notice an update. kwm, > > avl, or ahze may have tried to build it, and ran into problems, but I > > was not made aware. If you want to do the port, that would be great. > > > > Well, while generating temporary plist, I noticed that > epiphany-extensions actually doesn't honor PREFIX, probably because of > this line in configure: > > EPIPHANY_EXTENSIONS_DIR="$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=extensionsdir > epiphany-$_epiphany_api_version)" > > ..which obviously points to: > > > pkg-config --variable=extensionsdir epiphany-2.29 > /usr/local/lib/epiphany/2.29/extensions > > ..where libraries get installed, no matter of PREFIX. Also from the > quick glance it seems to me that the same issue is present in the > current 2.28.x port, which strikes me odd as I was under impression > that tinderbox runs tend to catch those. > > Anyway - what is the correct way to solve this, or possibly - am I > missing something in the big picture? > > m. Tinderbox will not catch this, because it uses the same prefix for epiphany and epiphany-extensions. About the lack of updates to this port, marcus is correct. It just fell though the cracks. Now that is known we missed a port, one of us will fix that soonish. Or do you want to do the work? -Koop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1267112635.4439.27.camel>