Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:25:29 +1100 From: "Dewayne Geraghty" <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> To: "'Willem Jan Withagen'" <wjw@digiware.nl> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, 'Adrian Chadd' <adrian@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Increasing the DMESG buffer.... Message-ID: <45E04CBCE376455A949D83B7237014B9@white> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=FqDhgUTpMLGeL=Pj69Upf_JVaONZPvBvHWML8EiM2DQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> <1353513692.69940.7.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50ACFC6C.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <50AD0E82.3070706@digiware.nl> <CAJ-Vmo=FqDhgUTpMLGeL=Pj69Upf_JVaONZPvBvHWML8EiM2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+1 (RAM is neither free nor abundant.) Increasing the default buffers, stack or heap use, should be carefully considered. There was a discussion about providing guidance/examples for loader.conf and sysctl.conf for various anticipated uses: firewall, workstation, servers, routers whether single/dual/multi core; perhaps this is where calls for values other than those necessary to get a basic general purpose machine working, should be? We manage servers providing all of: samba, squid, dovecot, sendmail, ldap, heimdal, apache on low-energy boxes with 1G RAM, and over 8 years FreeBSD has proven that it has "the power to serve".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45E04CBCE376455A949D83B7237014B9>