Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:39:09 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi Makefile src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_battery.c acpi_smbat.c acpi_smbus.h acpiio.h Message-ID: <436E860D.6000201@root.org> In-Reply-To: <6458.1131306853@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <6458.1131306853@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <436E5797.7090605@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes: >>I've said it many times: we need a real predictive algorithm. Taking a >>single sample will always have hysteresis problems. > > > I implemented my own algorithm and it works OK for me. Not perfect, > but OK: > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/powerd.patch I think that's what we have in -current, except we promote by 2 instead of 3. That version was contributed by multiple people, including you earlier. Is this version substantially different? -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?436E860D.6000201>