Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 01:58:54 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> Cc: binup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: design issues Message-ID: <20011015015854.X31066@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org>; from eric@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 05:05:15PM -0700 References: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 05:05:15PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote: > This weekend I sat down to work on some code for the binary updater, but I > didn't really get anything done because I thought that a few important > decisions where yet to be made, and really affect what I'm going to be > working on next. > > 1. I've heard speculation of an entirely new package framework, that would > include things such as base system components being installed as > packages. Is this anywhere near reality for 5.0-RELEASE, or should it be > considered a thought that has past? Who's working on this? If you're thinking of open-packages then I don't believe that it's up to this yet. I'm not aware of any other efforts. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjvKNM4ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBb1swCdH2RhukP0j5ig8RUxKctUa3Oe BSMAn0+6tgZ1TzeFVL5pkHt8jBNfrZwq =lwmA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011015015854.X31066>