Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:19:59 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. Message-ID: <199606191719.LAA06390@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <24614.835204652@time.cdrom.com> References: <199606191527.JAA05879@rocky.sri.MT.net> <24614.835204652@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > Unless you can say that NO-ONE is willing to do the bmake-munging > > process for them, then this is a moot point. Apparently Peter already > > did, and I don't see a burning need for doing groff. > > By now you've alraedy read my other responses so I'll not belabor the > point. Suffice it to say that I don't see an abundance or scarcity of > `bmakers' as the issue so much as I do the difficulty involved. Again, my arguement is that the 'difficulty' is part and parcel of being in the tree. > I'd hoped we could get off that treadmill. If it weren't difficult > then you wouldn't even have to say: See above. It's a worthwhile difficulty, in the same manner as re-writing the VM system was worthwhile and adding laptop capability was worthwhile. The time spent isn't always fun, but the resultant product is. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606191719.LAA06390>