Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 15:15:19 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, joerg@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-usrbin@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall - Imported sources Message-ID: <199506252215.PAA02506@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199506252144.XAA19343@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Sun, 25 Jun 1995 23:44:49 %2B0200 (MET DST))
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
* It has been submitted to either -current or -hackers (forgot which), * and nobody objected. You mean this one? === From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:27:55 +0200 Message-Id: <199506121927.VAA15888@ole.cs.tu-berlin.de> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: killall I miss the killall program like in Linux or Irix. Here is a little perl hack. #!/usr/bin/perl # # killall - kill all processes # : === This doesn't sound like a proposal to put it in the core part of the distribution. Not that I object the inclusion of this utility, of course. But maybe it will be clearer if we make it an explicit rule "need to be approved by -core" for inclusion in the src tree? It's mere formality in most cases and programs like this will only take one mail message.... Satoshihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506252215.PAA02506>