Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 15:15:19 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, joerg@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-usrbin@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall - Imported sources Message-ID: <199506252215.PAA02506@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199506252144.XAA19343@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Sun, 25 Jun 1995 23:44:49 %2B0200 (MET DST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* It has been submitted to either -current or -hackers (forgot which), * and nobody objected. You mean this one? === From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:27:55 +0200 Message-Id: <199506121927.VAA15888@ole.cs.tu-berlin.de> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: killall I miss the killall program like in Linux or Irix. Here is a little perl hack. #!/usr/bin/perl # # killall - kill all processes # : === This doesn't sound like a proposal to put it in the core part of the distribution. Not that I object the inclusion of this utility, of course. But maybe it will be clearer if we make it an explicit rule "need to be approved by -core" for inclusion in the src tree? It's mere formality in most cases and programs like this will only take one mail message.... Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506252215.PAA02506>