Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:00:10 +0100 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: "Michael Butler" <imb@protected-networks.net> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gbde and geli on 6.2 Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0709261800l22c60eapd9a009b873d329e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46FADB39.6000704@protected-networks.net> References: <3aaaa3a0709261509g414e3163mff45f9da3bc4d7f3@mail.gmail.com> <46FADB39.6000704@protected-networks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26/09/2007, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> wrote: > Chris wrote: > > Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in > > freebsd releases that are marked stable. > > > > It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the > > lba boundary around lba48. > > Could you please test the attached patch to /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c ? > > I believe this may be due to the error in the underlying ata driver > rather than specifically to do with encryption. > > As a side note - Soren, could we get this commited to both -current and > -stable if there aren't any significant objections? > > Michael > > yep I further read the link I posted and apologise I seen bad ata was mentioned. I will test on a local machine as I cant test that production machine again, as I understand it I just need to use a large hd greater then lba48? Thanks Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0709261800l22c60eapd9a009b873d329e6>