Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:17:16 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: <ZxEqfISBJIW75p_P@vm2> In-Reply-To: <CAGaXuiK52ufOs-eVfKHAYpGxRyGfCMpbbZy4GcShybTzHcjDGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> <Zw3YGPIBC_s-q-Vg@vm2> <Zw3dlDuaSXsIG-yX@vm2> <CAGaXuiLG4Qv2KgDtJveN3adLh6b8tEzC4j6OYfLo1_dj8BKZWQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zw_6SNSEW5mXMy_I@vm2> <CAGaXuiL_Fk=_FtU23RoJBP0WguU8_-y3Tb1iZ=T2unVv-2aRpA@mail.gmail.com> <ZxDdnSngi13UyZSL@vm2> <CAGaXuiK52ufOs-eVfKHAYpGxRyGfCMpbbZy4GcShybTzHcjDGg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >The patch has no effect at the host if the host is a data receiver. In this context, the vms being tested are on a bhyve host. Is the host a data sender, because the tap interfaces are bridged with bge0 on the host. Or is the host a data receiver, because data goes tapN => bge0 and then goes on to the iperf3 destination? The iperf3 destination was always a different physical machine, stable/14 --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZxEqfISBJIW75p_P>