Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 03:26:48 +0200 From: Rocco Lucia <rlucia@iscanet.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ng_fwdswitch netgraph node Message-ID: <A616E51E-7047-11D6-AA84-000393B296CE@iscanet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205241027560.88384-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:31:54AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > some comments.. > > 1/ it may be more useful to not make any distinction between > 'in' and 'out' hooks but just have connections.. > The hooks could be given purely arbitrary names > e.g. "source1" and "suspicious" > a hook could be configured as being 'read-only' by command > rather than by special name.. (though special names are > not a very bad way of doing it.. > "out-normal" > and > "out-dubious" > Ah, sure, that's a good idea, I'm going to rework it to be able to set node behavior sending it messages... that would consume some more cycles per packet tho. Thank you for the suggestion :) -- Rocco Lucia - rlucia@iscanet.com Iscanet Internet Services http://elisa.utopianet.net/~rlucia System and Network Admin C6E6 AC9A 1361 FB38 B47A 2792 9FC4 C52F 7A68 4468 Free unices for a free world. Support *BSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A616E51E-7047-11D6-AA84-000393B296CE>