Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:40:30 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <20120912144030.GA77434@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <504FE55C.8040308@bluerosetech.com> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <504FE55C.8040308@bluerosetech.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:29:00PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 2012-09-10 14:12, Brooks Davis wrote: > > [Please confine your replies to toolchain@freebsd.org to keep the thread > > on the most relevant list.] > > > > For the past several years we've been working towards migrating from > > GCC to Clang/LLVM as our default compiler. We intend to ship FreeBSD > > 10.0 with Clang as the default compiler on i386 and amd64 platforms. To > > this end, we will make WITH_CLANG_IS_CC the default on i386 and amd64 > > platforms on November 4th. > > Just to be clear, this change will only apply to 10-current, 10.0-R and > higher-numbered releases and branches, correct? That is, it won't apply > to RELENG_9 and earlier? Yes. We have no current plans to change the default on older branches. I do plan to merge changes that make it easier for users to choose clang as their base system compiler on 9-STABLE, but changing the compiler would be a terrible idea. -- Brooks [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFQUJ7eXY6L6fI4GtQRAjXNAKC9cCgLEgSLJYDzpo4W+wUXMjB01QCfeBrH HldAB8J+iQOROcMAFyPNlv0= =Vxk9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120912144030.GA77434>