Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:01:03 -0400 From: "Francisco Reyes" <fran@reyes.somos.net> To: "billf@FreeBSD.ORG" <billf@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Stan Osborne" <stan@craigslist.org> Cc: "freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: advocacy/21238: poor performance; missed opportunities Message-ID: <200009130431.AAA32671@sanson.reyes.somos.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009121913380.30467-100000@cnewmark.craigslist.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Stan Osborne wrote: >Ok take it that way. Go ahead and close the PR without ever >consulting the person who submitted it in the first place. I am very sad to report that I had a simmilar experience in terms of a PR in the not so distant past. It is as if there is a quota of how many PRs need to be handled or as if they want to keep the number of open PRs to a certain level. My PR was closed and I was basically told to write to the questions list and provide more info. I had written to the questions list prior to opening the PR. Moreover, I provided what info I thought was necessary/needed. I was not even given the opportunity to expand. This is the exact type of behavior that will totally discourage new users to use FreeBSD. I would almost rather not have PRs than to have this type of behaviour. francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009130431.AAA32671>